More on the lack of public support from CORE for the student letter, calling for 'more open, diverse and pluralist economics'. However,the student letter has been signed by a diverse group of academics and economists (see below).
This was sent to the FT on 3rd June but not published, hence the Blog.
This was sent to the FT on 3rd June but not published, hence the Blog.
Sir,
There are occasions when CORE members engage with those on the outside calling for alternatives. Andy Haldane wrote a supportive foreword to the report by students at Post-Crash Manchester, but they were dismissed by Diane Coyle as failing to ‘recognise the breadth of the courses available’ and by Simon Wren-Lewis as being 'fundamentally misguided’.
More generally,
the CORE steering
group and CORE contributors appear
united in their dismissal of alternative curricula: not a single one appears to
have signed the ISIPE open letter.
Surely someone from CORE has an encouraging word for the students? After all,
the letter is signed by a diverse group of academics and economists, many of
whom leave helpful comments: Ann Pettifor, Stephanie Blankenberg, Molly Scott
Cato, Robert Pollin, Michael Ash, Achim Truger, Arne Heise, Doyne Farmer,
Thomas Piketty, Lord Robert Skidelsky, Alan Kirman, Ha-Joon Chang, James
Galbraith, Peter Mooslechner, Lars P. Syll, Victoria Chick, Geoffrey Harcourt,
Marc Lavoie, Geoffrey M. Hodgson, Sheila Dow, John Komlos, Paul Davidson, Steve
Keen, Engelbert Stockhammer, Jean-Paul Fitoussi, Matheus Grasselli, Gary
Dymski, John Weeks, Ken Binmore, Malcolm Sawyer, Mathew Forstater, Ozlem
Onaran, Stephen Fazzari, Sheri Markose, Tae-Hee Jo, Thomas Palley and Yuval Millo.
Best
regards,
Neil Lancastle
Postgraduate student in finance and economics, University of
Leicester
No comments:
Post a Comment